PKD, Adapted

Collin beat me to the review, so I’ll simply say: if you’re a fan of weird fiction, Linklater’s A Scanner Darkly is worth your time. I saw it with my attorney as my final Massachusetts art-theater moviegoing experience, and it was very, very good. In fact, I’d say that the movie version pulled together the incoherencies of the original text in much the same way that Blade Runner extrapolated from and pulled together DADOES.

It’s a movie that knows all about drugs, and the tweaks and former tweaks who see it will well appreciate the ethos and deeply paranoid logic with which it constructs its paranoid anti-drug and anti-paranoia theme. I’ve heard some sci-fi fans complain that the movie fails in that it neglects to replicate the suffocating dread and paranoia of the book, but frankly, those fans are missing one of the movie’s big points, and one of PKD’s book’s big implicit points as well:

Drugs. Are. Fun. That’s why people do them.

Which, in and of itself, constitutes the lure of addiction, and its danger. The movie, in following the book’s indictment of the drug culture and its horrible casualties, would be deeply dishonest if it didn’t show why people do stuff like Substance D. (It also nicely encapsulates the reasons why “Just Say No” is an ineffective campaign to attempt to sell to teens: the logic of “Just Say No,” as the movie indicates, actually creates desire.) The comedic and comedic-paranoid moments in the movie, in the way they get you to laugh along and see (and even empathize with) the skewed logic of intoxication, humanize Arctor and his friends, and that’s what gives the movie’s final act its emotional punch.

Check it out.

PKD, Adapted

4 thoughts on “PKD, Adapted

  • July 24, 2006 at 2:04 pm
    Permalink

    Didn’t you know that the throttle screw turns the other direction when you travel South?”

    Very interesting movie. But not for everyone.

    Reply
  • July 24, 2006 at 8:12 pm
    Permalink

    I saw it yesterday. I went into it not having read the story or with any idea it was going to be animated. It dragged in places, I thought, and Keanu is as bad an actor animated as not, but it was interesting. Robert Downey, Jr. was riveting (if an animation can be riveting).

    Reply
  • July 24, 2006 at 10:10 pm
    Permalink

    For me, Keanu was, er, less bad. Downey, of course, has his own history, and was wonderful. And yeah, Kirill, that moment was priceless — that logic of the moment that seems, at the moment, so incontrovertible.

    For some, as you say.

    Reply
  • Pingback: Machina Memorialis » Blog Archive » Link Roundup: Manuscript Found in Bog, PKD, and Digital Memoirs

Leave a Reply